1) My editorial was in summary about gun control and how it should be more strict. My article as an example talks about how a gun that was used one month ago in the pentagon to shoot two police officers in the pentagon has now been sold to a Georgia gun dealer, which was taken from the Memphis police department during a drug bust. The author of my editorial sees problems with this: that it is absurd to put guns back into circulation and that guns should be destroyed after used for evidence. The author thinks that gun show loophole to require background checks for all purchasers should be closed. They think we should definitely crack down on all illegal gun shows to stop prohibited purchasers from buying and shooting again.
2) I think this is an interesting article, and I do agree that we should crack down on illegal gun shows, because the criminals who cannot legally buy guns can do so in a gun show with no background checks. Guns used prior by criminals taken by police for evidence should be taken and destroyed after evidence, so we can lower the number of guns out there.
3)http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/03/19/AR2010031904620.html
:)
No comments:
Post a Comment